Online Arbitration Platform: What to Look For Before Moving a Case Online
Before moving an arbitration matter online, the arbitrator or case administrator should decide what the platform must actually manage. A video link alone is not an online arbitration platform. A shared folder alone is not enough either.
The platform should support the procedural life of the case: filings, evidence, directions, decisions, meetings, deadlines, participants, access rights, and export. It should also make transitions manageable when a new lawyer, replacement arbitrator, added party, or administrative assistant joins.
A practical distinction
Good selection questions are practical. Can each participant see the materials they are supposed to see? Can the arbitrator find the latest submission without searching an inbox? Are procedural decisions separated from ordinary correspondence? Is there a clear calendar? Can the full file be exported at the end?
netADR provides an online arbitration workspace with structured case documents, messages, calendar tools, video meetings, permission controls, backup, and export. It can be set up when a real matter arises, which is usually when arbitrators have the clearest reason to adopt a new tool.
For practitioners, the useful test is whether the workflow can be explained to a new participant without forwarding a long archive of messages. If the case record depends on private inboxes, local folders, and temporary links, the procedure is more fragile than it needs to be.
The practical value of online arbitration platform is strongest when it keeps the arbitration record clearer, not when it adds another disconnected tool.
More from Choosing Arbitration Software
Managing Arbitration Cases
Moving Arbitration Online
Security and Confidentiality
International and Institutional Cases
For Independent Arbitrators